The 1% Rule in Real Estate Investing
Understanding the 1% Rule
The 1% Rule is a quick and simple calculation used by real estate investors to assess whether a rental property is likely to generate positive monthly cash flow. According to the rule, the monthly rent of a property should be equal to or greater than 1% of the purchase price. For instance, if a property costs $200,000 to acquire, it should ideally rent for at least $2,000 per month. If the numbers align with or exceed this threshold, the deal may be worth further analysis.
This rule isn’t intended to be a deep financial model. Rather, it acts as an early screening tool—an easy way to separate potentially strong cash-flowing investments from those that are less likely to perform. For busy investors reviewing multiple deals, the 1% Rule provides a valuable shortcut to identifying which properties deserve a deeper look.
Why It Matters to Investors
At its core, the 1% Rule is about cash flow discipline. It sets a minimum income benchmark that helps investors avoid properties that may look attractive but fail to deliver consistent returns. This is especially important for those pursuing buy-and-hold strategies, where steady rental income is key to covering operating expenses and building long-term wealth.
That said, the rule doesn't work in isolation. It doesn’t take into account other essential costs such as property taxes, insurance, maintenance, management fees, vacancy rates, or capital expenditures. It also ignores how the property is financed, meaning your mortgage interest and loan terms—major factors in real-world cash flow—aren’t part of the equation.
For these reasons, the 1% Rule should be viewed as an initial filter, not a final decision-making tool. Investors should use it as a gateway to more thorough financial evaluations like calculating cash-on-cash returns, net operating income (NOI), and internal rate of return (IRR).
Where the Rule Shines
The 1% Rule tends to work best in affordable, cash-flow-driven markets, often found in the Midwest or parts of the South. Investors pursuing turnkey rentals or using strategies like BRRRR (Buy, Rehab, Rent, Refinance, Repeat) frequently lean on the 1% Rule, especially during the acquisition phase. When properly executed, a BRRRR deal that doesn’t meet the rule on the front end may surpass it after value-add renovations and rent increases.
For long-term investors focused on dependable income, particularly those building scalable portfolios, this rule can help ensure that properties at least meet a baseline financial standard.
Where It Can Fall Short
In high-cost or appreciation-driven markets such as California, New York, or parts of Florida, the 1% Rule can be overly restrictive. Properties in these regions may deliver strong appreciation and tax advantages over time but fail to meet the monthly rent threshold set by the rule. This doesn’t mean those investments are poor—only that they require a different analytical framework.
The rule also isn’t designed for evaluating short-term rentals like vacation homes or Airbnbs, where seasonal income and occupancy variability can significantly skew monthly figures. Similarly, luxury properties, which often command higher purchase prices relative to rent, rarely meet the 1% test yet might offer other advantages.
Using the Rule Wisely
For maximum benefit, investors should combine the 1% Rule with local market knowledge. Understanding typical rents, expenses, and tenant demand in your target neighborhoods can provide critical context. A property that fails the 1% Rule in a high-demand area with low vacancy and strong appreciation might still be worth pursuing. Conversely, a property that meets the rule in a declining area with high turnover or repair issues may still be a risky buy.
It’s also important to consider the condition of the property. A fixer-upper may not meet the 1% Rule at acquisition, but after renovations, it could become a high-performing rental. Financing terms play a role as well—lower interest rates and favorable loan structures can help improve cash flow, even if the rent is slightly below the 1% threshold.
Ultimately, flexibility and a balanced approach are key. The 1% Rule should not be a rigid requirement but a helpful benchmark that promotes smarter, faster decision-making. When paired with more robust financial modeling and aligned with your overall investment goals, it can help you avoid costly mistakes and stay focused on high-potential opportunities.
Final Thoughts
The 1% Rule remains one of the most widely used heuristics in real estate investing, and for good reason. It offers a fast, accessible way to estimate whether a property could be a viable rental investment. However, like all rules of thumb, it has its limitations. Smart investors understand when to apply it—and when to go beyond it.
By using the 1% Rule as a first-pass filter, and then following up with deeper financial analysis, you can make more informed, profitable decisions. Whether you’re new to real estate or managing a growing portfolio, mastering this rule is a solid step toward long-term success.
Let me know if you’d like this formatted into a downloadable PDF, newsletter content, or adapted into a social post or email for your investor audience.